
Introduction
1844
1846-1850
1851-53
1856 1857
1859 1861
1863 1865
1867 1868
1882
1886-1887
1888 1890
1891 1893
1895
1896-1897
1900
1901 1902
1903 1904
1905 1907
1908 1909
1913 1915
Message Today |
1891
The proposals regarding consolidation or centralization
was considered during the General Conference in Battle Creek. But
before it was considered, Sis. White made a statement:
“If there is committed to us a special message, as we believe,
that message must go, without reference to the customs or prejudices
of the world, not governed by a policy of fear or favor… Patterning
after the world and adopting a worldly policy, must be guarded against.
Men in responsible positions should go to God as often as did Daniel
in earnest supplication for divine help. “
Life Sketches,
p 314.
“The General Conference for 1891 was held in Battle Creek
March 5-25. Sunday forenoon, March 15, the committee of twenty-one
appointed at the preceding General Conference to consider the consolidation
of the publishing interests, presented its report. The committee
spoke favorably of the objects to be gained by consolidation, but
advised that the Conference move cautiously. They then proposed
that the General Conference Association be reorganized, with a view
to its eventually securing control of all the publishing work of
the denomination.”
“In harmony with the advice of this committee, the General
Conference Association, intended at first as an agency for the holding
of church property, was reorganized with a board of twenty-one members,
and was given control of many lines of work, of which publishing
interests stood first.”
Life Sketches,
p 313.
Who prompted the call of consolidation?
“Notwithstanding frequent counsels to the contrary, men continued
to plan for centralization of power, for the binding of many interests
under one control. This work was first started in the Review and
Herald office. Things were swayed first one way and then another.
It was the enemy of our work who prompted the call for the consolidation
of the publishing work under one controlling power in Battle Creek.
“
Testimonies
for the Church, vol 8, p 217.
“Immediately after the conference”, Sis. White and his
son were sent to Australia. “In his reports and addresses
to the General Conference of 1891, Elder S. N. Haskell … He
pleaded that teachers be chosen to open a school in Australasia;
and also that Mrs. Ellen G. White and her son, W. C. White, spend
some time in that field.
“Action was taken by the Mission Board, immediately after
the Conference, inviting them to go in the autumn. This would bring
them to the new field of labor in Australia's summer. The steamer
sailing in October was found to be overcrowded, and the departure
from San Francisco was delayed till the sailing of the Alameda,
November 12. “
Life Sketches,
p 331.
Was it God’s will that Sis. White leave America? What
did she write Bro Olsen in 1896?
“I have not, I think, revealed the entire working that led
me here to Australia. Perhaps you may never fully understand the
matter. The Lord was not in our leaving America. He did not reveal
that it was His will that I should leave Battle Creek. The Lord
did not plan this, but He let you all move after your own imaginings.
The Lord would have had W. C. White, his mother, and her workers
remain in America. We were needed at the heart of the work. . .
. But the Lord read the hearts of all. There was so great a willingness
to have us leave, that the Lord permitted this thing to take place.
Those who were weary of the testimonies borne were left without
the persons who bore them. Our separation from Battle Creek was
to let men have their own will and way, which they thought superior
to the way of the Lord… It was not the Lord who devised this
matter. I could not get one ray of light to leave America.”
Letter 127,
1896. (also in 10MR 392-93)
Before reaching Australia, while yet sailing on the ocean, she
wrote:
“The world must not be introduced into the church, and married
to the church, forming a bond of unity. Through this means the church
will become indeed corrupt, and as stated in Revelation, "a
cage of every unclean and hateful bird."… And when men
in the highest responsible positions make no difference between
those who serve God and those who serve Him not, they evidence that
their eyes are not single to the glory of God; therefore their whole
body is full of darkness… Let us not form unholy bonds of
union with the friends of the world; for God has pronounced His
curse upon all such unions… Already has the power of darkness
placed its mold and superscription upon the work that should stand
forth untainted, unpolluted from Satan's cunning devices…
Woe be unto him whose wisdom is not from above but from beneath!”
Testimonies
to Ministers, p 265-277.
If the SDA church would get married with the world thereby forming
a bond of unity, it would become “a cage of every unclean
and hateful bird”. Rev. 18:2. How could being united or married
to the world make the church Babylon?
“In the Bible the sacred and enduring character of the relation
that exists between Christ and His church is represented by the
union of marriage… The unfaithfulness of the church to Christ
in permitting her confidence and affection to be turned from Him,
and allowing the love of worldly things to occupy the soul, is likened
to the violation of the marriage vow. The sin of Israel in departing
from the Lord is presented under this figure; and the wonderful
love of God which they thus despised is touchingly portrayed: "I
sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the
Lord God, and thou becamest Mine." "And thou wast exceeding
beautiful and thou didst prosper into a kingdom. And thy renown
went forth among the heathen for thy beauty: for it was perfect
through My comeliness, which I had put upon thee. . . . But thou
didst trust in thine own beauty, and playedst the harlot because
of thy renown." "As a wife treacherously departeth from
her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with Me, O house of
Israel, saith the Lord;" "as a wife that committeth adultery,
which taketh strangers instead of her husband!" Ezekiel 16:8,
13-15, 32; Jeremiah 3:20.”
“In the New Testament, language very similar is addressed
to professed Christians who seek the friendship of the world above
the favor of God. Says the apostle James: "Ye adulterers and
adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity
with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the
enemy of God."
Great Controversy,
p 381-382.
“A virtuous woman represents a pure church, a vile woman an
apostate church. Babylon is said to be a harlot.”
Spirit of
Prophecy, vol 4, p 233.
Sis. White warned the SDA church who is married to Christ that
if she would depart from Him, and unite herself with the world,
she would become the harlot of Babylon listed in Revelation 18.
More >> |